Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Sub Club sunk

I am old enough to have observed my children’s tastes swing markedly over the years from McDonald's to Subway. While Maccas seems stuck in a no-man's-land between cringing promotion of its healthier-than-healthy options while still trying to satisfy the basic urges of the chip-and-burger brigade, Subway has successfully ridden the public wave of better eating.

Subway’s offering is straightforward and uncomplicated. While none of its franchisees or their staff has attended a Subway equivalent of Hamburger University, it seems to offer reasonably healthy food at reasonable prices with reasonable service usually thrown in.

But one change has been the demise of Subway’s loyalty program, Sub Club. It was long lasting, fairly simple to execute and rated about a three out of five stars for customers. In classic green stamps fashion, you were handed a number of coupons or stamps based on what you’d bought, affixed them to your Sub Club card, then redeemed when you’d filled up the card. Fairly simple mechanism.

Where Subway lost points was that it wasn't quite simple enough. While the stamp-earning formula was fairly straightforward (one stamp for a "six-inch", two for a "foot-long"), it was more confusing how the “burn” end worked out. I always had to remind myself from the fine print on the card what I really would get out of it. And it was - collect 8 stamps (one full card), then if I buy "one medium fountain beverage", I’d get a free six-inch sub for nothing. Alternatively, I could collect 16 stamps and get a free foot-long sub if I purchased a fountain drink.

With loyalty programs it matters less if I don’t perfectly understand the "earn" rate, but if the “business end” is hard to understand – the “what’s-in-it-for-me” bit, then that’s more of a problem. Also, if it has too many hurdles – in this case the mandatory drink purchase - then it can start to lose gloss.

Nevertheless, with Subway’s Sub Club, I soldiered on. With all my family members happy to frequent Subway, we racked up he stamps rather quickly, and I got used to the way the deal worked. I was even handed stamps at a Subway in London, fully redeemable in Warrigal Road, Ashburton!

But Subway wasn't enjoying the deal as much as I was, and last year announced the end of the party. No more Sub Club.

Now, loyalty programs are hard to start up, but they’re a darn sight harder to stop. It’s a bit like the boss handing out the turkey at Christmas – whatever goodwill he or she gained in year 1 is more than wiped out when he or she forgets or decides against it in year “n”.

Subway didn’t fare too badly. It gave customers plenty of notice about when the stamps would no longer be handed out; it gave them plenty of time to cash in their chips and then when it was all over it actually handed out cash discounts for any cards not filled up – a 100% redemption rate play at the end of the promotion. Hard to fault that. The only thing that irked was their mixed messages about why they were pulling up stumps. The notice in-store stated that the Club meant that only some customers, not others, were getting the goodies, so it was somehow inequitable. Purlease! Try extending that principle elsewhere in society! The reason more widely promoted, even by Subway, was that the opportunities for fraud, no doubt coupled with general moral decay was pushing up the share of chancers and sheisters getting unscheduled access to treats. When Sub Club stamps became widely available on eBay, Subway's owners were not overly impressed. Even worse was the talk of staff theft of the stamps, evidenced by entire rolls of stamps appearing online! So maybe the demise was inevitable.

The bit of data I don’t have regards the residual impact of stopping the loyalty program. Of course there’s no public data available on that. And it would be hard for the Subway bean counters to work that out as well. Because ultimately loyalty programs only offer the cream on top. The world’s most effective loyalty program is only going to add a marginal benefit to the bottom line. Could be worth millions if you’re big enough, but not so easy to read off a 3-D column chart or a low-angled, tilted, chunk-out pie chart!

In some countries, a new Subway loyalty card has sprung up. But for us in the rest of the Subway world, we're missing our stamps. Would Subway be regretting its move? What do you think?

6 comments:

the vampire's dream said...

The other side of loyalty programs might be the annoyance of loyal customers feeling they are getting "ripped off".

I frequented subway because:

* its a healthy alternative
* it was convenient to go to

Its no longer convenient to get to - in fact its quite inconvenient (there isn't one within a gazillion bakers miles of me) so i try to look for other healthy alternatives.

Given the basics of convenience and their main sell - a fresh healthy sandwich - topped with reasonable service was enough (and will be enough again if/when my location changes) to get me there. What i did not like was the loyalty program - in fact, i would have not liked "any" loyalty program.

Loyalty literally to me meant "a return of some sort" to their loyal customers - i was a loyal customer - but could not be bothered with carrying the cards and sticking the stamp. The "return of some sort" would be costing subway money - so i felt like i was helping pay for returns to other customers - i would rather have got the sandwich for 10 cents less on the spot.

Pity they have taken the program away but not bought the price down.

I understand though that mine is only one segment - and possibly a small one... if they found that loyalty programs increased their reach - financial it very well might make sense... they would not lose me unless they became uncompetitive on price compared to other healthy alternatives.

the vampire's dream said...

In addition to my previous comment.. thinking about it some further... i would have been very happy if there was a way i was getting the "loyalty deal" without having to get the card and stamps... so technology and process (rather than taking away the loyalty component altogether) could have "solved" the issue (made me happier). Perhaps if they had facial recognition software and i did not need to carry or do anything... but was rewarded for my loyalty - now that would be good (ignore the privacy concerns for the moment... but you get the idea :-)

As a side track though... i have had a thunderbolt... and now no longer understand why retailers don't use the credit card as a loyalty card (for people that refuse to carry yet another card)... its quite simple to do actually (in a well designed system)...
* i present my credit card
* they charge it for that transaction
* they store the number (one way encrypted) with my purchase history
* they look up my purchase history (based on the encrypted number)
* they present an offer on the receipt

If i change credit cards (or get a new one with my current one expires) - the slate is wiped clean, but hey, usually lasts a couple of years... enough time for the retailer to build a habit - and also to convince me to get their loyalty card :-)

Phil Hawkins said...

Some good thoughts there c0t0s0d0! Your geographic issues provide excellent insight into the utility of loyalty programs, which will only assist at the edges, and will never provide sufficient incentive for wary customers to jump crevasses or ford maintain streams. Fundamental issues of price, location, quality and service will always prevail. It’s a lesson even the biggest retailers should note!

The Sub Club’s low-level “technical” solution had its pluses and minuses. That you physically owned the “points” – they were stuck to your card – eliminates the need for websites, call centres and plug-ins to monitor your progress, but it did open up more obvious opportunity for fraud.

Having a credit card replace a loyalty device opens up a much bigger can of worms. Would you restrict it to just one credit card? Would you need a solution that covered many cards and platforms? Most significantly, if I were running Subway I’d be very concerned at not only indirectly associating my brand with financial institutions, but more importantly losing the marketing value of having my brand in their pocket. Corporate ego plays a big part in these things. Participating retailers in programs like FlyBuys have to bite the bullet of not having their identity on the FlyBuys card, but trade this off with being part of a bigger, more durable program rather than risk a single retailer scheme.

It will be interesting to gauge how the new Subway Card is faring in its countries of execution. One key consideration could be wallet space, as the flimsy former Sub Club card carried no burden. For how many occasional Subway customers will the new credit card thick replacement card fail to warrant wallet space?

the vampire's dream said...

Hello Mr.Road,

With a credit card (any credit card is usable ... would not be restricted to any one type of from any single institution) you could use it to identify repeat customers (privacy concerns aside)... in a retailer where the payments are 90% by card and say their program penetrates only 10% of their base, they can at least use the credit card identity program to personalise offers on the bottom of receipts and promote their more fully fledged card. So, its not so much a replacement (although for some customers it could be if that is what the customer wanted) as it is to get 90%+ penetration from day one and better being able to serve virtually all customers who walk into the store.

Phil Hawkins said...

Technologically appealing, c0t0, but the freedom to grab your own data is surely compromised by third parties - financial institutions and the credit card schemes (Visa, M'card)? Ok if you do a deal with them, but unless I'm missing something here, you do have to do it with another party and their card (unless you're a bank or a GE). Great from day 1, but there might be a lot of haggling to get to that first day?

the vampire's dream said...

Hello Mr.Road,

You don't have to do a deal with any 3rd party... imagine this as a transaction:

* You go to a store you and pay by credit card
* the store systems scans your card - reads your card number, then forks 2 processes
- process 1 does the usual confirm with bank that to charge the card is okay etc...
- process 2 encrypts the card number (one way) and stores it in the customer database along with a list of what you have purchased

the next time you come back to the store and offer the same card, when process 2 encrypts the number, it will be the same encrypted hash/string and so can immediately pull up what you purchased the last time (or all historical information if need be) instantly... then, you can be offered something special at point of sale (or on the receipt).

c0s0t0d0.